Shramik Utkarsha Sabha, Bombay .... Appellants. Versus Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. another.... Respondents. Letter Patent Appeal No. 63 of 1991 in W.P. No. 1772 of 1991, …

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995. Showing the contexts in which unfair labour practice" industrial disputes act appears in the document Change context size Current 291. visions. the obvious intent of the legislature which enacted them was that they should operate in tandene and complement each ...

In Girja Shankar Kashi Ram v. The Gujarat Spinning & Weaving Co. Ltd., 1962 Supp. (2) SCR 890, it was held that 'Section 27A of the B.I.R. Act provides that no employee shall be allowed to appear or act in any proceeding under the Act except through the representative of employees, the only exception being the provisions of sections 32 …

1995 ALLMR ONLINE 193 (S.C.), Shramik Utkarsh Sabha Vs. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and others. ... A.M. AHMADI AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ. Shramik Utkarsh Sabha Vs. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and others. Civil Appeal No. 1480 (CC 17612) of 1995 7th February, 1995. ... AIR 1985 SC 311 : (1985) 2 SCR 492 : 1985 Lab IC 242 ...

Contribute to businessgitv/ru development by creating an account on GitHub.

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995 ... which is duly signed by and on behalf of the Textile Labour Association and The Arvind Mills Ltd. 4. On 2-2-1995 the respondent-Company had given a notice under section 42(1) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "the B.I.R. Act ...

The Petitioner relied upon the celebrated judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors., wherein it was held that an unrecognised Union cannot file a complaint of unfair labour practice when there is a recognised union already in existence. The said application was contested by the ...

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., against respondent No. 2, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, a recognised and an approved Trade Union under relevant provisions of the Bombay …

6. The first respondent filed a complaint before the Industrial Court alleging the unfair labour practices mentioned in items 5 and 6 of Schedule III of the MRTU & PULP Act. Item 5 of Schedule III states that it is an unfair labour practice on the part of a trade union "to stage, encourage or instigate such forms of coercive actions as willful 'go slow', squatting on …

, 2004 Latest Caselaw 776 Bom

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., against respondent No. 2, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, a recognised and an approved Trade Union under relevant provisions of the …

Shramik Utkarsha Sabha, Bombay .... Appellants. Versus Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. another.... Respondents. Letter Patent Appeal No. 63 of 1991 in W.P. No. 1772 of 1991, decided on 13-12-1991. Advocates appeared : S.J. Deshmukh with …

Contribute to luoruoping/id development by creating an account on GitHub.

the name of Raymond Woollen Mills was set up in Thane Maharashtra 1925 Raymond forayed into retail by opening the rst exclusive retail showroom in King's Corner BallardEstate in Mumbai 1958 A manufacturing facility was set up at Jalgaon Maharashtra to meet the increasing demand for worsted woollen fabrics 1979 Raymond at a glance …

The Industrial Court has dismissed the complaint on the basis of the judgment of the Supreme court in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and Ors., 1995 I CLR 607. The Industrial Court has held that no other union but the representative union under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act (for short, 'BIR Act') or a recognised union ...

11. The learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submitted that the question of unrecognized Union representing employees in all complaints under the MRTU and PULP Act had been considered by the Supreme Court in Shramik Utkarsha Sabha v. Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd., reported at 1995 (1) CLR 607. In that case, it was held that it was …

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995 Showing the contexts in which unfair labour practice appears in the document Change …

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha Vs. Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors [1995] INSC 120 (7 February 1995) Bharucha S.P. (J) Bharucha S.P. (J) Ahmadi A.M. (Cj) CITATION: 1995 AIR 1137 1995 SCC (3) 78 JT 1995 (2) 284 1995 SCALE (1)533 . ACT: HEAD NOTE: 1. Delay condoned. 2 Leave granted. 3.

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., against respondent No. 2, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, a recognised and an approved Trade Union under relevant provisions of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, hereinafter referred to as "the B.I.R. Act", alleging therein that the agitating employees along with other suspended or dismissed employees have engaged …

raymond woollen mills ltd brazil ; DAWN OF A NEW Raymond the name of Raymond Woollen Mills was set up in Thane Maharashtra 1925 Raymond forayed into retail by opening the rst exclusive retail showroom in King's Corner BallardEstate in Mumbai 1958 A manufacturing facility was set up at Jalgaon Maharashtra to meet the increasing …

13. The Supreme Court while deciding the case in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. has held thus in para l3: "l3. The MRTU and PULP Act takes note of the provisions of the BIR Act. Many of its definitions are …

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995 ... Bench: Bharucha S.P. (J) PETITIONER: SHRAMIK UTTARSH SABHA Vs. RESPONDENT: RAYMOND WOOLEN MILLS LTD. & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT07/02/1995 BENCH: BHARUCHA S.P. (J) BENCH: BHARUCHA S.P. (J) …

13. The Supreme Court while deciding the case in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. [1995 (1) L.L.N 804], has held thus in Para, 13, at pages 809 and 810: "The MRTU and PULP Act takes note of the provisions of the BIR Act. Many of its definitions are stated to be those contained in the BIR Act.

Get free access to the complete judgment in Shramik Utkarsha Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., And Others on CaseMine.

Contribute to sbm2023/sbm development by creating an account on GitHub.

JUDGMENT BHARUCHA, J.:—Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The question for consideration in this appeal is : does a representative union under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (BIR Act) have the exclusive right to represent the employees of the concerned industry in complaints relating to unfair labour practices under the …

tha microdot mills. victoria mills mumbai land elbeeveenl. victoria mills ltd mumbai in india Stock VICTORIA MILLS Stock Price Today Markets Get the latest Victoria Mills stock pr

Supreme Court of India Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995 Equivalent citations: 1995 AIR 1137, 1995 SCC (3) 78, AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT 1137, 1995 (3) SCC 78, 1995 AIR SCW 1181, 1995 LAB. I. C. 1591, (1995) 2 SCT 778, 1995 SCC (L&S) 631, (1995) 70 FACLR 884, (1995) 2 LABLJ 301, …

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha vs Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. & Ors on 7 February, 1995. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download …

Shramik Utkarsh Sabha V S Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Woollen Kamgar Sanghatana Vs Seth Industries Ltd. The Industrial Court has dismissed the plaint on the basis of the judgment of the Supreme court in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd and Ors 1995 I CLR 607 The Industrial Court has held that no other union but the …

Chat online raymond mills - uniquesteelcoza.Raymond mill thane.Related products shramik utkarsh sabha v s raymond woollen mills ltd 1995 clr 607 sc - get prices more detailed.Raymond mill in thane - mtm crusher.Raymond thane land sale - the economic times.

Mr. Kochar relied very heavily on a recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. & Ors. (1995 I. C.L.R. 607) to contend that the Supreme Court in this case has categorically held that when a recognised Union exists in an Undertaking, no other Union could file any complaint under the provisions of ...

Contribute to businessgitv/ru development by creating an account on GitHub.

Equivalent citations: (1999)236CTR(SC)34, [1999]236ITR34(SC), AIRONLINE 1997 SC 128, 2008 (14) SCC 218, (1999) 152 CUR TAX REP 418, (1999) 236 ITR 34, (1999) 151 TAXATION 552 ... Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JUDGMENT. 1. The challenge in this case is to the reopening of the assessment of Raymond Woollen Mills …

and integrates R&D raymond woollen mills ltd thane 400606 raymond woollen mills ltd thane Fashion And Others on CaseMine.Chat online raymond mills - uniquesteelcoza.Raymond mill thane.Related products shramik utkarsh sabha v s raymond woollen mills ltd 1995 clr 607 sc - get prices more detailed.Raymond mill in …

Woollen Kamgar Sanghatana, vs Seth Industries Ltd The Industrial Court has dismissed the complaint on the basis of the judgment of the Supreme court in Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd and Ors, 1995 I CLR 607 The Industrial Court has held that no other union but the representative union under the Bombay Industrial …

In support of his contention he relied upon the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in Shramik Utkarsha Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and Ors. 1992 I CLR 273 and the judgment of the Apex Court in that very case i.e., Shramik Utkarsh Sabha v. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., and Ors., 1995 I CLR 607. 6.

Facts: The first respondent filed a complaint before the Industrial Court alleging the unfair labour practices mentioned in Items 5 and 6 of Schedule III of the MRTU & PULP Act. …